Site miroir du Centre d’Etude et de Recherche sur la Bipédie Initiale
Page d'Accueil Accueil
Plan Plan
Résumé Résumé
Statistiques Statistiques
Comment rédiger ? Comment rédiger ?
Quoi de neuf ? Quoi de neuf ?
Pourquoi ce site ? Qui sommes-nous ? Pourquoi ce site ? Qui sommes-nous ?
1) Théorie de la Bipédie Initiale, Theory of Initial Bipedalism, Die Theorie der URSPRÜNGLICHEN ZWEIFÜSSIGKEIT Théorie de la Bipédie Initiale, Theory of Initial Bipedalism, Die Theorie der URSPRÜNGLICHEN ZWEIFÜSSIGKEIT
2) BIPEDIA BIPEDIA
   - BIPEDIA n° 1
   - BIPEDIA n° 2
   - BIPEDIA n° 3
   - BIPEDIA n° 4
   - BIPEDIA n° 5
   - BIPEDIA n° 6
   - BIPEDIA n° 7
   - BIPEDIA n° 8
   - BIPEDIA n° 9
   - BIPEDIA n° 10
   - BIPEDIA n° 11
   - BIPEDIA n° 12
   - BIPEDIA n° 13
   - BIPEDIA n° 14
   - BIPEDIA n° 15
   - BIPEDIA n° 16
   - BIPEDIA n° 17
   - BIPEDIA n° 18
   - BIPEDIA n° 19
   - BIPEDIA n° 20
   - BIPEDIA n° 21
   - BIPEDIA n° 22
   - BIPEDIA n° 23
   - BIPEDIA n° 24
   - BIPEDIA n° 25
   - BIPEDIA n° 26
   - BIPEDIA n° 27
   - BIPEDIA n° 28
3) Téléchargement de BIPEDIA en PDF Téléchargement de BIPEDIA en PDF
4) Liens Internet Liens Internet
   - Cryptozoologie
   - Hominologie
   - Paléoanthropologie
Site réalisé avec BioSPIP
Ce site est optimisé pour tous les navigateurs qui respectent les normes internet !
Retour à la page d'accueil  Théorie de la Bipédie Initiale, Theory of Initial Bipedalism, Die Theorie der URSPRÜNGLICHEN ZWEIFÜSSIGKEIT


New Questions About Purpose of Big Brains

jeudi 11 juin 2009

New Questions About Purpose of Big Brains

By Robin Lloyd, LiveScience Senior Editor

posted : 04 June 2009 09:25 am ET

Group living, as opposed to a solitary life, apparently taxes the brain. In fact, sociality has made brains bigger over evolutionary time across numerous groups of animals, a lot of biologists and anthropologists have figured over the years.

This "social brain hypothesis" may pertain in some groups, but overall it’s false when it comes to the natural history of carnivorous mammals such as cats, dogs, weasels, bears and their relations, two evolutionary biologists now say.

It’s true that bigger brains - in such animals as whales, dolphins, primates and birds - are associated with greater behavioral flexibility and adaptability to new environments. But big brains relative to overall body mass (this ratio is referred to as encephalization) also take a lot of energy to maintain. And some brains tend to get smaller when animals are domesticated or are hunted less by other animals. So the overall trend has been hard to discern.

John Finarelli of the University of Michigan and John Flynn of the American Museum of Natural History in New York sought to work out the relationship on a bigger data set that anyone had previously devised - including 289 terrestrial carnivores, about half of which were fossil (extinct) species. They laid data on sociality, body mass and brain size over the evolutionary tree for all carnivores to investigate the relationship between brain size and sociality.

They found the relationship might hold up among living members of the Canidae family (wolves, foxes, coyotes and jackals), but that’s about it. For instance, sociality should be widespread among musteloids (weasels, raccoons, skunks and red pandas) and bears, which have had brain to body mass ratio increases over the course of their evolution. But they aren’t. All bears in fact are solitary and the musteloids are mostly "nonsocial."

And while brain size does scale up from small cats to large cats, hyenas are large-brained but also fairly solitary and mongooses are small-brained and usually social.

Overall, Finarelli and Flynn found at least six separate changes in brain sizes for the group across their evolutionary history.

"The idea that sociality played a causative role in the expansion of relative brain size is not valid for this clade [Carnivora] as a whole," the authors write in the May 25 early online issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Even in Canidae, it could be that increasing brain-size facilitated more social behaviors (rather than sociality causing increasing brain sizes), or perhaps canids evolved larger brains to enhance their social behaviors. Finarelli said he was surprised at how complicated the evolutionary transformations around brain size turned out to be. "I thought at the outset that there would end up being a few instances of increased encephalization, but the number of these, the fact that there were instances of decreased encephalization, and that consistent scaling parameters (that is, how fast brain volume changes as you add body mass) defined the changes in some groups was a pleasant surprise."

So why do brain sizes vary ? "That is the $64,000 question," Flynn told LiveScience. "Evolutionary change in encephalization is a widely observed phenomenon, but has been very hard to explain." And what about primates ? The relationship between sociality and brain size in this group remains untested, Flynn said.

"Increased brain size may mean different things to different groups, depending on unique evolutionary histories, ecologies, life history attributes etc.," he said. "That is to say, it might be that seeking simple, one-size-fits-all explanations across all mammals (or all amniotes [animals such as birds, mammals and reptiles that give birth to young inside eggs]) has been the problem all along. Nevertheless, seeking general explanations (and then testing them with all available data), within clades or across groups, is a valuable goal of evolutionary studies."

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation, AMNH, the Brown Family foundation Graduate Fellowship and the University of Michigan Society of Fellows.


VOIR EN LIGNE : Live Science








LES AUTRES BREVES
DE CETTE RUBRIQUE :

-jeudi 20 août
Ink found in Jurassic-era squid
-jeudi 25 juin
The Mystery Ape of Pleistocene Asia
-lundi 22 juin
Orangutans to replace chimpanzees as our closest relatives
-vendredi 19 juin
Could the orang-utan be our closest relative ?
-jeudi 11 juin
New Questions About Purpose of Big Brains
-lundi 4 mai
Neandertals Babies Didn’t Do the Twist
-lundi 6 avril
L’erreur de DARWIN
-lundi 6 avril
Humans Walked On Modern Feet 1.5 Million Years Ago, Fossil Footprints Show
-mardi 22 avril
And the first animal on Earth was a...
-dimanche 3 février
Réécrire l’histoire de l’espèce humaine



Précédent Haut de page Suivant
 
Copyright CERBI © 1998-2013 All rights reserved François de Sarre
Site officiel : http://perso.wanadoo.fr/initial.bipedalism/,
Site miroir : http://cerbi.ldi5.com
 admin  -  webmaster  -